Subprime US Banking Financial Crisis Explained Part 3

Posted by: admin  /  Category: financial

http://www.informedtrades.com/
The 3rd and final lesson in a series on the subprime mortgage US Banking financial crisis explained.

Duration : 0:7:17




Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

26 Responses to “Subprime US Banking Financial Crisis Explained Part 3”

  1. Spjungen Says:

    So from what I …
    So from what I understand, a structured investment vehicle is really like a hedge fund in the housing market, only it derives its value from home equity, meaning that people basically traded securities of which the only real value was the market price of the collateral and the dept owed by the borrower, which he/she may or may not be able to pay? …If that’s correct than I don’t see how it’s possible not to expect a crisis from such a ridiculous investment vehicle.

  2. InformedTrades Says:

    Hey Coriolanus,

    Hey Coriolanus,
    The thing is the FED actually does not “set” interest rates the way most people think.

    Basically since they are so big they buy and sell in the open market, causing changes in the money supply, which then causes changes in the interest rates.

    This is important because at some times we need lower interest rates than other, like right now for example, and the market may not dictate this at the proper times.

    There are also about 500 other reasons but I’m out of comment room!

  3. coriolanus78 Says:

    I have a question, …
    I have a question,why do we have to have an institution setting the interest rate rather than leaving it to the market,it seems to me that manipulating the interest rate by the fed is what got us in trouble to start with.I think it is impossible for anybody or any institution for that matter given the size and perplexity of our ecconomy to predict the best interest rate at any moment

  4. kiztherain Says:

    Thank you, nice job!
    Thank you, nice job!

  5. shepm2002 Says:

    Great work Dave . …
    Great work Dave .knowledge is power, shep from Ireland

  6. crownofHisglory Says:

    what do i need to …
    what do i need to study to be able to articulate this crisis the way you re able to
    what would be a good major in school to take on

  7. kinw1234 Says:

    can anyone help me? …
    can anyone help me?

    from what im aware banks took assets off balance sheets to avoid having to hold capital.

    for that to happen it needs to be a true sale rite?

    does this not mean the assets no longer belongs to the bank? how come it comes back onto thier balance sheet and gets written down??

  8. tyarikat Says:

    Hello David, why …
    Hello David, why did the Federal Reserve start to raise interest rates in late 2004?

  9. dubmaverick69 Says:

    2007 uptick rule …
    2007 uptick rule removed – the gang bang by wall street started by targeting aggressively banking stock,
    GS, BOFA, MS, MLYNCH, LEHMAN, BEAR STEARS
    ask the fat cats they laughing their way to the bank everyday

  10. dubmaverick69 Says:

    The Commodity …
    The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 or CFMA (H.R. 5660 and S.3283) is United States federal legislation which repealed the Shad-Johnson jurisdictional accord, which had banned single-stock futures in 1982. The legislation also provided certainty that products offered by banking institutions would not be regulated as futures contracts.

  11. dubmaverick69 Says:

    please do us a …
    please do us a favor and explain these which will answer all these question
    1.The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, enacted November 12, 1999, is an Act of the United States Congress which repealed part of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, opening up competition among banks, securities companies and insurance companies. The Glass-Steagall Act prohibited a bank from offering investment, commercial banking, and insurance services.-

  12. irisqi Says:

    You stated that as …
    You stated that as a result of the subprime mortgage crisis a liquidity crisis arose. Wasn’t it more of a solvency problem?

  13. saintveil Says:

    Feds lost control …
    Feds lost control over the Fed Rate, according to this video:
    v=bL0bgz_VHTo&NR=1&yt

  14. saintveil Says:

    Feds lost control …
    Feds lost control over the Fed Rate, according to this video:
    v=bL0bgz_VHTo&NR=1&yt

  15. LoneOarman Says:

    Another video …
    Another video states that the Feds somehow lost control over the Federal Rate, and that’s what blew things up.

  16. LoneOarman Says:

    He omitted the fact …
    He omitted the fact that bad loans were insured in order to get a higher rating to make them look good; and insured again by speculators that did not even own the investment. Unregulated and perfectly legal insurance fraud (misrepresentation and casino gambing).

  17. jussittinherewatchin Says:

    I was wondering the …
    I was wondering the exact same thing. I’m no expert, but I think they do that to contract the supply of money in circulation, which in turn helps to control inflation and price increases. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong!

  18. elwalvador Says:

    I say we remove …
    I say we remove Geithner and Mary Schapiro and appoint David Waring as the head of both the Treasury Department and the SEC.

  19. RyanBachoo Says:

    Thanks mate … my …
    Thanks mate … my ticket to my 7000 word report on the financial crisis. :-)

  20. jxskillz82 Says:

    So why did the …
    So why did the Federal Reserve increase the interest rate in 2004?

  21. bleberlin Says:

    thank you very much …
    thank you very much. i have a much better idea of whats going on .good job

  22. InformedTrades Says:

    my pleasure thanks …
    my pleasure thanks for the comment. If you look on the homepage of my site I have recently posted an article “7 solutions to the financial ciris” which covers this. Best Regards, Dave

  23. Guedingen Says:

    Good man, many …
    Good man, many thanks – any ideas as to what can be learned from this fiasco and what legal checks can be put in place to avoid such a thing happening again?

  24. tre675 Says:

    Thanks for the …
    Thanks for the videos. I learned alot.

  25. tflipnoy Says:

    Dude, you’re the …
    Dude, you’re the man! You helped me out with my college paper.

  26. Public Insurance Adjuster Says:

    I think Greenspan is getting senile, today he said that you can stop asset bubbles by increasing capital requirements. That just increases the cost of credit. The next time you have a real estate bubble, you’ll have the same problem, assuming that banks are still in the business of loaning against real estate. If you want to stop this problem, then eliminate the federal subsidies for real estate development and investment, then require people in that industry to put their own money at risk instead of someone elses. If Greenspan really wants to change the banking system, though, then simply ban 95% and 90% LTV loans. Require a bigger equity cushion. BTW, the “too big to fail” argument is a fallacious one. During the Great Depression, Canada had no bank failures. The reason was that their banks were very large. The banks closed branches, etc., but none of them failed. By contrast, the US was dominated by thousands of very small banks, and we had more than 10,000 of them fail. So there is nothing inherently unsafe about a banking system dominated by large banks. The real problem with large banks is that during good times, they don’t provide enough competition for each other.